<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Rustler's Quickbooks Tips</title>
	<link>http://rustler.freeblogit.com</link>
	<description>Stuff I have figured out the hard way about QB 2006</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Use QB on the road by Charlie Russell</title>
		<link>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/07/27/use-qb-on-the-road/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/07/27/use-qb-on-the-road/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>In theory, this would work. In practice, you need to be cautious. Some number of people find that when you try to merge the updates you will get an error that prevents the merge from taking place. If there is ANY SINGLE ERROR in the file, the ENTIRE merge will not take place. There isn't a way around this if you see the error. In the user forums we see a fair number of people who complain about this happening. The error handling in the process is very poor.

Prior to creating the accountant's copy I would recommend that you check the starting file for any errors, and perhaps do a rebuild. Clean up any errors that show in the error log (which can be a bit cryptic, unfortunately). Some of us believe that these kinds of errors are what might be causing the merge problem later on.

And don't let the office staff delete records or rename things while you are on the road, because if they delete something that you make a reference to in your "road" copy, this could possibly be a source of the error. 

Unfortunately, I've not seen any analysis of what exactly causes these merge problems, so these precautions might not prevent the error.

Personally, when I'm on the road, I usually have an Internet connection available, so I use a product like LogMeIn to access my office computer to do the updates there. Which isn't as convenient, but works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In theory, this would work. In practice, you need to be cautious. Some number of people find that when you try to merge the updates you will get an error that prevents the merge from taking place. If there is ANY SINGLE ERROR in the file, the ENTIRE merge will not take place. There isn&#8217;t a way around this if you see the error. In the user forums we see a fair number of people who complain about this happening. The error handling in the process is very poor.</p>
<p>Prior to creating the accountant&#8217;s copy I would recommend that you check the starting file for any errors, and perhaps do a rebuild. Clean up any errors that show in the error log (which can be a bit cryptic, unfortunately). Some of us believe that these kinds of errors are what might be causing the merge problem later on.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t let the office staff delete records or rename things while you are on the road, because if they delete something that you make a reference to in your &#8220;road&#8221; copy, this could possibly be a source of the error. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, I&#8217;ve not seen any analysis of what exactly causes these merge problems, so these precautions might not prevent the error.</p>
<p>Personally, when I&#8217;m on the road, I usually have an Internet connection available, so I use a product like LogMeIn to access my office computer to do the updates there. Which isn&#8217;t as convenient, but works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Negative Inventory by Charlie Russell</title>
		<link>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/07/18/negative-inventory/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/07/18/negative-inventory/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>That was a real life scenario, too. More or less.

You can get close to that report by modifying an item listing, but I can only get it to show items with a quantity &#60;= 0 (and can't get just negative items, so far). Export it to Excel and do more filtering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a real life scenario, too. More or less.</p>
<p>You can get close to that report by modifying an item listing, but I can only get it to show items with a quantity &lt;= 0 (and can&#8217;t get just negative items, so far). Export it to Excel and do more filtering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Negative Inventory by rustler</title>
		<link>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/07/18/negative-inventory/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>rustler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/07/18/negative-inventory/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>ROFL ok Charlie you got me, so the Purchasing Manager is a one person department huh?  Title instead of pay - just like banks - ROFL.

Then at the very least the accounting program should have an exception report that generates automatically each morning at a certain time showing that kind of thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ROFL ok Charlie you got me, so the Purchasing Manager is a one person department huh?  Title instead of pay - just like banks - ROFL.</p>
<p>Then at the very least the accounting program should have an exception report that generates automatically each morning at a certain time showing that kind of thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Negative Inventory by Charlie Russell</title>
		<link>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/07/18/negative-inventory/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/07/18/negative-inventory/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Why should an inventory system allow you to have a negative inventory? Well, how about this situation: It’s 3:30 PM and the UPS driver will arrive any moment. You have to get this order picked, packed and invoiced before he comes so that you can get the order to the customer when they need it. The purchasing manager went home with the flu earlier today and the morning’s receipt documents are sitting on her desk. The items are here, you have them in your hand, but QuickBooks says you don’t have them because the receipt wasn’t entered. You don’t have permission (or the time) to enter the receipts, you can’t make a manual inventory adjustment because that can only be done in single user mode (and you can’t kick the payroll clerk out!), so you just go ahead and enter the invoice, making the inventory go negative.

A bit contrived, but it does happen. There are workarounds, but they take time and make you change your procedure. Computers are suppossed to make life easier, not harder...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should an inventory system allow you to have a negative inventory? Well, how about this situation: It’s 3:30 PM and the UPS driver will arrive any moment. You have to get this order picked, packed and invoiced before he comes so that you can get the order to the customer when they need it. The purchasing manager went home with the flu earlier today and the morning’s receipt documents are sitting on her desk. The items are here, you have them in your hand, but QuickBooks says you don’t have them because the receipt wasn’t entered. You don’t have permission (or the time) to enter the receipts, you can’t make a manual inventory adjustment because that can only be done in single user mode (and you can’t kick the payroll clerk out!), so you just go ahead and enter the invoice, making the inventory go negative.</p>
<p>A bit contrived, but it does happen. There are workarounds, but they take time and make you change your procedure. Computers are suppossed to make life easier, not harder&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Excel for import by Charlie Russell</title>
		<link>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/07/23/using-excel-for-import/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/07/23/using-excel-for-import/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bugs &#38; Quirks by rustler</title>
		<link>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/04/25/bugs-quirks/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>rustler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/04/25/bugs-quirks/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Non-inventory items are designed to be used for expenses there are income items for income.  Non-inventory items can be used in two ways:

1. as an expense you don't want to track specifically by vendor

2. to buy something for resale that you do not want to stock. To use it this way you have to check mark the block that says "item used in an assembly or for resale" or something like that.  When you do that it opens up some more fields, COGS and sales - the screen looks just like an inventory item then.  When you buy it - the cost goes to COGS or the expense account you selected - usually COGS for items being sold.  Then when you sell the item the sales is posted to the income account you selected on the item screen.  Since cost is posted to COGS, and income is posted to sales, the P&#38;L will show net profit. The point being that cost of items sold is a special category in QB and in IRS reporting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non-inventory items are designed to be used for expenses there are income items for income.  Non-inventory items can be used in two ways:</p>
<p>1. as an expense you don&#8217;t want to track specifically by vendor</p>
<p>2. to buy something for resale that you do not want to stock. To use it this way you have to check mark the block that says &#8220;item used in an assembly or for resale&#8221; or something like that.  When you do that it opens up some more fields, COGS and sales - the screen looks just like an inventory item then.  When you buy it - the cost goes to COGS or the expense account you selected - usually COGS for items being sold.  Then when you sell the item the sales is posted to the income account you selected on the item screen.  Since cost is posted to COGS, and income is posted to sales, the P&amp;L will show net profit. The point being that cost of items sold is a special category in QB and in IRS reporting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bugs &#38; Quirks by Anton</title>
		<link>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/04/25/bugs-quirks/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/04/25/bugs-quirks/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>I'm confused then...  Are you saying that if I set up a non-inventory part with just an expense account associated to it, QB will somehow know the difference between my purchase price and my sales price and calculate the difference as income for that item?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused then&#8230;  Are you saying that if I set up a non-inventory part with just an expense account associated to it, QB will somehow know the difference between my purchase price and my sales price and calculate the difference as income for that item?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bugs &#38; Quirks by rustler</title>
		<link>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/04/25/bugs-quirks/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>rustler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/04/25/bugs-quirks/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>The way non-inventory is designed to be used in the case you are talking about, is to mark it as being for resale.  When you do that QB opens the fields to include COGS and income accounts.  Then the cost goes to COGS, and the sales price goes to income as it should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way non-inventory is designed to be used in the case you are talking about, is to mark it as being for resale.  When you do that QB opens the fields to include COGS and income accounts.  Then the cost goes to COGS, and the sales price goes to income as it should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bugs &#38; Quirks by Anton</title>
		<link>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/04/25/bugs-quirks/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/04/25/bugs-quirks/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>*Quote*
Non-inventory Items 

QB restricts items from pointing to this or that kind of account a lot (like the above entry). For some reason QB does not restrict you from selecting an income account when setting up a non-inventory item. Non-inventory items are supposed to be for expenses, why QB would not restrict the selection is a mystery. Use service items for income, that is what you do, you perform a service.


QB does not restrict the selection to just expenses, because in my case I buy a non-inventory part and mark it up to resell to the customer. The markup amount would be my income!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Quote*<br />
Non-inventory Items </p>
<p>QB restricts items from pointing to this or that kind of account a lot (like the above entry). For some reason QB does not restrict you from selecting an income account when setting up a non-inventory item. Non-inventory items are supposed to be for expenses, why QB would not restrict the selection is a mystery. Use service items for income, that is what you do, you perform a service.</p>
<p>QB does not restrict the selection to just expenses, because in my case I buy a non-inventory part and mark it up to resell to the customer. The markup amount would be my income!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 14500 Names by rustler</title>
		<link>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/07/03/14500-names/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>rustler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rustler.freeblogit.com/2008/07/03/14500-names/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>ROFL I found it, I added the Dymo label printer, it shows up under preferences&#62;Integrated applications I had forgot I had it in use, but that still doesn't account for date of the application, I added it in 2008.  I'll edit the post, thanks.  I don't use shipping manager.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ROFL I found it, I added the Dymo label printer, it shows up under preferences&gt;Integrated applications I had forgot I had it in use, but that still doesn&#8217;t account for date of the application, I added it in 2008.  I&#8217;ll edit the post, thanks.  I don&#8217;t use shipping manager.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
